2017 Ford Escape Fuel Economy: MPG & L/100 km by Engine

By Don St Germain, owner of a 2017 Ford Escape SE Updated August 26, 2026

The old version of this page leaned too much on broad owner estimates. A better starting point is the official EPA rating for the exact engine and drivetrain, then you can compare that number with what your own Escape is doing. Alice, our 2017 Escape SE, is a good reminder that weather, trip length, tires and driving style can move the real number quite a bit.

EPA ratings: the 2.5L FWD is rated 21 city / 29 highway / 24 combined MPG. The 1.5L EcoBoost is 23/30/26 MPG with FWD and 22/28/24 MPG with AWD. The 2.0L EcoBoost is 22/29/25 MPG with FWD and 20/27/23 MPG with AWD.

Official 2017 Escape EPA fuel-economy ratings

Engine / drivetrainCity MPGHighway MPGCombined MPGCombined L/100 km*
2.5L, FWD2129249.8
1.5L EcoBoost, FWD2330269.0
1.5L EcoBoost, AWD2228249.8
2.0L EcoBoost, FWD2229259.4
2.0L EcoBoost, AWD20272310.2

*L/100 km figures above are conversions of the U.S. EPA combined MPG ratings. EPA MPG uses U.S. gallons. If you compare Canadian and U.S. numbers, make sure you are using the same units.

MPG, L/100 km and km/L converter

If you are comparing Canadian and U.S. listings, this converter makes the units easier to compare.

Quick MPG · L/100km · km/L Converter

Type in any one box and the rest update automatically. Tip: Lower L/100km is better; higher mpg and km/L are better.

2.5L fuel economy

The naturally aspirated 2.5L was offered with front-wheel drive. The EPA lists it at 21 city, 29 highway and 24 combined MPG. That works out to about 9.8 L/100 km combined.

If you are shopping for an Escape S, this is the engine to know. The 2017 Escape S guide and engine comparison explain where the 2.5L fits in the lineup.

1.5L EcoBoost fuel economy

The 1.5L EcoBoost has the best EPA combined rating in the 2017 Escape lineup when paired with FWD: 26 MPG combined. AWD drops the combined rating to 24 MPG.

Alice has the 1.5L EcoBoost. Short winter trips around town can look very different from a long highway drive, so I would not judge the engine from one tank. Track several fill-ups before deciding whether your fuel economy has actually changed.

2.0L EcoBoost fuel economy

The 2.0L EcoBoost trades some fuel economy for more power. EPA ratings are 25 MPG combined with FWD and 23 MPG combined with AWD. Owners comparing Titanium models or a 2.0L SE should keep the drivetrain in mind because AWD changes the rating.

Why your real-world number can be lower or higher

EPA ratings are standardized test results, not a promise for every trip. Ford's own economical-driving guidance points to many of the same things owners notice in day-to-day use:

Trip computer versus hand-calculated fuel economy

The Escape can display average and instantaneous fuel use, which works well for spotting trends. For a longer-term check, I prefer comparing odometer distance with the amount of fuel added over several fill-ups. One tank can be distorted by idling, weather, a partial fill or a very different driving pattern.

If your displayed average suddenly changes, think about what else changed at the same time. New winter tires, a roof box, a sticking brake, repeated short trips or an engine warning can all move the number.

What fuel does the 2017 Escape use?

Ford says the 2017 Escape is designed to operate on regular unleaded gasoline with a minimum 87 octane rating. If you are troubleshooting poor fuel economy, changing octane is not a substitute for checking maintenance, tire pressure or a warning light.

When poor fuel economy may point to a problem

A gradual seasonal change is normal. A large, sudden drop deserves more attention, especially if it comes with rough running, a check-engine light, weak acceleration, fuel smell, brake drag or an engine that takes unusually long to warm up.

Sources checked